SERIES OF UGLY CARTOONS IN POLITICS AND THE ARTS

SERIES OF UGLY CARTOONS IN POLITICS AND THE ARTS

A cartoon is an example of a type that is usually animated and sometimes not real or only partly real. The exact meaning has changed over time, but now it usually means an image or series of images made for satire, humor, or humor. Or a movie that is animated based on a set of drawings. In the first sense, someone who makes ugly cartoon characters is called a cartoonist. In the second sense, that person is usually called an animator.

The idea came from the Middle Ages, when it was first called a drawing for a painting, fresco, tapestry, or stained-glass window. Caricatures were used in the 19th century. In 1843, Punch magazine was the first to use them. The first irony is that magazines and newspapers have humor in them. Since then, political cartoons and comic strips have used it. As the medium changed at the beginning of the 20th century, it started to talk about animated movies that looked like cartoons on paper.

Ugly Cartoon Characters in the Fine Arts

Peter is looking after a caricature of Christ by Raphael. a cartoonish tapestry pattern, no. 1516, in full size

A caricature is a large drawing that looks like a painting on stiff paper, a stained glass window, or a pattern on a tapestry. The word “caricature” comes from the Italian word “cartoon” and the Dutch word “carton,” which are both words for strong, heavy paper or cardboard. consists of ugly cartoon characters that were often used to make frescoes when painted on wet plaster for several days (Janet). The last piece of work was given to skilled workers.

These kinds of caricatures often have holes in the shape of a design. When a bag of mascara is knocked or “thrown” at the caricature on the wall, it leaves black dots (“popping”) in the plaster. Caricatures by artists, like those of Raphael in London and Leonardo da Vinci, are valuable in and of themselves. The eyes of the loom bunkers were made to look like colorful tapestry boards.

Political Cartoons with Ugly Characters

Political cartoons are like paintings in that they show what is going on in the world of politics. They criticize in a subtle way, which is then cleverly copied with humor and satire until the critic is angry.

People think that William Hogarth’s satire in pictures led to the rise of political cartoons in England in the 18th century. In the 1750s, Georgetown Shend made the first cartoons and drawings that were about politics. Both of them were from London, yes. Gallagher looked into how satire and caricature could be used in the medium. He is often called the “father” of political cartoons.

George III, in which he was shown as a victim of hypocrisy, but most of his work was about making fun of George III’s goals. France’s revolution and the rise of Napoleon. In the years after the Gallery, from 1815 to 1840, George Crookshank became one of the best cartoonists. His career was known as a social publication for English publications for popular publications.

In a cartoon, a circle of men are smiling and pointing to a man with their fingers to the right.

“Who stole people’s money?” Nasty Tweed stands for the ring.

“/”That’s all.”

By the middle of the 19th century, many of the most important political newspapers in many other countries were full of ugly cartoon characters making political comments. Thomas Nast showed in New York City how the realistic style of German drawing could change the way Americans drew caricatures. And helped get rid of it. In fact, Tweed was caught in Spain after cartoons by Nast helped police figure out who he was. Sir John Tannell was the talk of London in Britain. Under the July monarchy in France, Honoré Daumier created a new type of political and social caricature that shed light on King Louis-Philippe, who was the most well-known monarch at the time.

Political cartoons can be funny or gross, and they can sometimes get their point across. Funny people often have nothing to say in their own defense. There haven’t been many of them. In Britain, 1921 was the first time in more than a hundred years that a cartoonist was tried and found guilty. . H. Thomas, who was in charge of the National Union of Railways (NUR), sued a British Communist Party magazine for libel.

Thomas said that cartoons and words showing what happened on “Black Friday,” when he supposedly betrayed the blocked Mining Federation, were insulting. Thomas was worried that the way the far left portrayed him would hurt his role in the minds of most people. Communism, which came from the Soviet Union, was a new part of European politics, and ugly cartoon characters with no history looked at the limits of the law against blasphemy. Thomas won the case and got his good name back.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *